Tag Archives: social justice

Persistence is “Key” in a Successful Journey…

MAK banner 2024

Image courtesy of the Hennepin County Library

On July 24th I participated in a heartfelt and candid recorded conversation with Myron Metcalf; a Minnesota Star Tribune Columnist and the great, great, great grandson of Mary Ann Key. Myron is responsible for creating the Mary Ann Key Book Club.

I had introduced myself to Myron in the fall of 2024 at a book club talk at the Hennepin County Library in downtown Minneapolis. The featured speaker at that meeting was Anthony Ray Hinton, an exoneree who had written a memoir about his experience of being wrongfully convicted titled, The Sun Does Shine.

Following Hinton’s talk, I approached Myron and shared my story. I gifted him a copy of my second edition of Reclaiming Lives. My hope was that he’d read it and be so moved by it that he’d reach back out with an offer to highlight this story in some profound way.

In my futility, I often harken back to something my friend, Byron Lichstein, former Wisconsin Innocence Project (WIP) attorney had said at one of our Walks that, “Persistence and determination will be the deciding factor to move this case forward.”

Former WIP attorney Byron Lichstein at the 2011 Walk for Truth and Justice at the Brown County Courthouse in Green Bay, Wisconsin

So…after publishing the third edition* of my book, I contacted Myron again and included the link for the new edition. He responded with an offer to include my book in the library’s summer reading list. Our recent conversation in their latest Mary Ann Key Book Club Newsletter is the result. Many thanks to Myron Medcalf for this amazing opportunity!

August 4, 2025

Our 2026 season book club title and program details will be announced in February. In the meantime, the Mary Ann Key Book Club newsletter will highlight authors from the Twin Cities in conversation with Myron Medcalf about their latest books and work within the community.

Myron Medcalf and Joan Treppa discuss “Reclaiming Lives: Pursuing Justice for Six Innocent Men”

(Run time just over 15 minutes)

Joan Treppa is a social justice advocate for those who’ve been victimized by the criminal justice system. She’s best known for her unwavering advocacy on behalf of six Green Bay, Wisconsin men she believes were wrongfully convicted in 1992 for the death of coworker, Tom Monfils, a case cited as one of the most notorious injustices in Wisconsin history. With no formal legal training, Joan’s actions illustrate the power of persistence and drive to highlight the voices of those silenced. 

Her first edition of Reclaiming Lives: Pursuing Justice for Six Innocent Men, a four-and-a-half-year labor of love project, won three book awards. More importantly, it has played a significant role in the recent releases of some of the convicted men. Treppa currently resides in Minneapolis, MN with her husband, Mike.

Our journey on behalf of the six men is not yet complete. Please help out by watching the video, hitting the “like” button, and sharing it far and wide. Thank you!

*Note: If you’d like a paperback copy of this edition your best bet is to order it directly through my publisher, Kirk House Publishers. Amazon currently has it listed with an overpriced vendor. However, the pricing of the audiobook, hardcover, and e-book on Amazon are correct.

Hey Y’all! Tip(sy)ing the Scales of Justice Toward Truth…

Our venue on July 21st was the recently opened Hey Y’all Typsy Taco Bar (now permanently closed). It occupied the vacated space of the restaurant better known as Betty Danger’s. This new space was charming and inviting. And it had the iconic Ferris wheel still on site, still accessible to diners.

 

But that was not the ride attendees experienced for my second book launch in NE Minneapolis. It was more of a roller coaster of deep emotion including laughter, anger, gist, and full-on support for a dedicated initiative on behalf of six innocent men.

Approximately 30 people attended to support this endeavor, to meet my special guest, Keith Kutska, and to hear him speak about his experience of being targeted, charged, and convicted for a crime he did not commit.

FYI: Because Keith was released on parole, he was required to ask for permission from his Parole Officer (PO) in order to travel over the border from Wisconsin into Minnesota. He showed me his “Travel Permit,” a piece of paper he needed to have with him at all times while he was away. Keith joked about it when he arrived but I don’t think any of us truly appreciate the feelings associated with having restrictions such as these placed on us as adults.

In my introduction, I shared Keith’s readiness to take back his life and accomplish meaningful things. High on his wish list was an eagerness to collaborate with me on book events. I also shared this heart-wrenching quote from Keith which I included in my book:

“Prior to his release and in our final moments during my first prison visit with him, he became thoughtful. ‘I have to tell you something,’ he had said as he looked me squarely in the eyes. ‘In the span of time between the failed attempt at a new trial for Reynold Moore and the start of the legal proceedings by the MN law firm, your letters kept me alive.’”

(Top L) Amy Jauman, (Top R) Debbie Russell, both part of the Women of Words (WOW) writing Group.

In attendance were longtime and more recent friends. Former attorney, Steve Kaplan, who represented Keith in a post-conviction evidentiary hearing in 2015, was there to lend his unwavering support. My program mimicked the previous book launch in Wisconsin with an explanation of my involvement in this endeavor, a summary of the case, followed by questions from the audience.

   

Keith was nervous at first. Even though I reassured him that this would be a positive experience, he, like the other men, was unsure of how well he would be received. He eventually felt more at ease and became animated and somewhat thoughtful. And after twenty-eight years of wrongful incarceration, he was unapologetic about his unfettered opinion of the criminal justice system.

Following the program, feedback varied:

One person shared their agitation over the negatively broad picture Keith had painted of the entire system. This person stressed that it’s not like that. I thought back to my partnership with Johnny Johnson, the retired crime scene expert who became livid with how unethical and corrupt the lead detective had been while investigating this case initially. I remembered Johnny’s vow to make sure he didn’t get away with it. Both Johnny and this person had worked in the legal field. Both similarly asserted that they had worked hard and had dedicated their careers to doing things the correct way.

Which brings me to an important point I make in my book: “I do want to emphasize that even after all I’ve learned about this case and about wrongful convictions in general, I firmly believe that our legal system gets it right the majority of the time. We just need to be cognizant of those instances when it doesn’t.”

Other comments included:                                                                                                                    “You did a wonderful job of putting him [Keith] at ease,” and

“You guys did a great job tonight! It was very interesting hearing Keith’s perspective on things.”

This past week I participated in a recorded conversation that I will be sharing as soon as it’s available. In it I was asked if I feel there has been a shift in public opinion regarding this case. I believe there has. I believe that no matter the roughness of the ride, we will continue to raise the bar toward truth and justice…

Note: Some photos were taken and sent to me by some of the attendees.

A Haunting Resemblance…

April 19, 2025 marked the thirty-year anniversary of the Oklahoma City Bombing, a horrific incident classified as the largest terrorist act ever committed on US soil. A fitting day to revisit the following exercise:

You be the judge:

Middle image is a police sketch. Which of the adjacent photos is the better match:  A or B?

                           A                                            Police Sketch                                         B

Why I administer this test: 

At the time of the incident, it hit…well…sort of close to home. Based on the results of administering this exercise in the past few years, especially when testing young adults, it could have marked a definite turning point in the life of my family.

When the bombing happened in 1995, a police sketch of the suspect was circulated on the news. Mike and I felt it was a stark resemblance of someone close to us, someone who was also in the military at that time, but stationed in another state. In fact, calls came in from all over the country from family members who expressed that same concern.

In this case justice was served. However, when the perpetrator, Timothy McVeigh, was finally caught and his face appeared in news clips, our first impression was that his facial features didn’t match the police sketch as well as the facial features of the person we knew.

With that said, my point with this exercise is less about guessing the correct answer and more about illustrating how unreliable police sketches/photo lineups are. I use this exercise when giving talks that include the main causes of wrongful convictions, and more specifically, mistaken identity which happens in 27% of wrongful conviction cases.

The results:

The majority of young people typically choose image A. I’ve used this exercise in classrooms and have actually witnessed a unanimous or majority vote for image A.

Those who know of the incident typically choose image B for obvious reasons.

A significant number of participants are not able to choose and say it could be either A or B.

When I ask participants to disclose why they choose one image over the other the answers are all over the map. They cite the ears, eyes, nose, hairline, lips, or chin as defining characteristics. One participant cited the length of the neck as a factor. What’s more, many attribute similar likenesses from both of the images to the police sketch. For instance, while some feel the ears in image A best match the police sketch, others claim the ears in image B best match the sketch. The point is that we all see things differently based on our innate biases and interpretations which is why photo lineups are so unreliable.

Time for full disclosure. The correct answer is B.  

But who is the person in image A? That’s our son, Jared! In 1995, he was in the Marines and was stationed in California. Years later, while preparing this exercise for a school visit I asked Jared if he remembered the incident and if he had a photo I could use for the lineup. He said he had never seen the sketch so I sent it to him. He was shocked by the resemblance to a photo of himself from his military days which he sent to me! The photo I’ve used is that photo.

What if Jared had been in Oklahoma City during the investigation? Could he have been arrested based on his resemblance to the sketch? I think so. Many others think so. And the fact that Timothy McVeigh was executed for this crime adds another layer of fear that this could have been our son’s fate! A possibility that will forever haunt us…

Note: Another layer in this saga about our son, Jared, in relation to eyewitness testimony will be forthcoming soon in a very insightful upcoming blog. Stay tuned!